Happy Accidents and Bureaucratic Debacles: New Ways of Working Towards Impact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v8i1.6667Abstract
Over the last decade, culture sector researchers have aimed to expand our understanding and measurements of impact assessment. In this paper, the authors take a deep dive into the happy accidents that create new ways of managing and working at several creative hubs in Canada. These happy accidents influence governance structures and practices these spaces take up but also help leaders and facilitators to respond to emergent needs in the cultural communities they seek to support. Drawing from two rounds of interviews and field research over the last four years, we compare seven creative hubs across Canada that have transformed their approaches to leadership and community engagement. We consider, first, how three types of creative hubs talk about their visions and values, and then how they operationalized those values in the spaces they are charged with activating. We look at two typical non-profit organizations (Tett Centre, National accessArts Centre), three social enterprises (cSpace, Culture Link and Artscape) and two outliers (UKAI, BC Artscape - the latter defunct). Many of these organizations face challenges as regional operations. Some explicitly aim to ameliorate the legacies of colonialism, discrimination and lack of representation in the culture sector. UKAI and BC Artscape are particularly interested in disrupting economic valuation frameworks by putting feelings and compassion at the centre of their operations. Others are compelled by more responsive but still competitive incubators for precarious creative workers, including cSpace and CultureLink. Consequently, we ask: in what ways is each hub ‘successful’ on their own terms, and which are useful exemplars to others? We look at each organization’s narratives of impact, process and affect emerging from overcoming challenges that include the global Covid-19 pandemic, bureaucratic debacles such as offering a disability organization a heritage site that is only accessible by stairs, and a series of awkward missteps and honest efforts towards decolonization.
References
Artscape. (2023, September 29). Artscape Receivership Update. Retrieved from Artscape: https://www.artscape.ca/2023/10/02/artscape-receivership-update-september-29-2023/
Banks, M. (2010). Autonomy Guaranteed? Cultural Work and the “Art—Commerce Relation”. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(3), 251-269. doi:10.1080/14797581003791487
BC Registry Services. (2018, July). Incorporating a Community Contribution Company. Retrieved from BC Registry Services: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/employment-business-and-economic-development/business-management/permits-licences-and-registration/registries-packages/pack_01_ccc_-_bc_community_contribution_company_incorporation_package.pdf
Boon, J. (2018, December 10). Arts hub gets $10 million in public funding. Retrieved from The Coast: https://www.thecoast.ca/news-opinion/arts-hub-gets-10-million-in-public-funding-19825896
Canada Council for the Arts. (n.d.). Glossary. Retrieved from Canada Council for the Arts: https://canadacouncil.ca/glossary
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
City of Vancouver. (2021). 2021 Cultural Grants (CASC, Cultural Spaces, Capacity, Cultural Equity) and Community Services Grants (Indigenous Early Learning & Childcare). Vancouver: Vancouver City Council. Retrieved from https://council.vancouver.ca/20210518/documents/r5.pdf
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2019, March). The Social Impact of Cultural Districts. Retrieved from Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN): https://gcdn.net/product/the-social-impact-of-cultural-districts/
Croteau, J. (2022, February 18). Conflict over historical staircase offends Calgary disability arts group: ‘It reeks of discriminatory practices’. Retrieved from Global News: https://globalnews.ca/news/8630816/calgary-disability-arts-group-historical-staircase-conflict/
Dempwolf, C., Scott, J. A., & Fabiani, M. D. (2014). Innovation Accelerators: Defining Characteristics Among Startup Assistance Organizations. College Park: Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. Retrieved from 10.13140/RG.2.2.36244.09602
Déziel, M.-O., & Duchesneau, G. (2019). Exploring the Phenomenon of Creative Hubs. Toronto: Telefilm Canada. Retrieved from https://telefilm.ca/en/etudes/exploring-the-phenomenon-of-creative-hubs
Dovey, J., Pratt, A. C., Moreton, S., Virani, T. E., Merkel, J., & Lansdowne, J. (2016). The Creative Hubs Report 2016. London: Technical Report British Council. Retrieved from https://creativeconomy.britishcouncil.org/media/uploads/files/HubsReport.pdf
Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020). How can an enhanced community engagement with innovation districts be established? Evidence from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. Cities, 96(1), 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102430
Essig, L. (2018). Value Creation and Evaluation in Arts Incubators. International Journal of Arts Management, 20(2), 32-45. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44989712
Furbert, A. (n.d.). Call to Action #83. Retrieved from TRCtalk: http://courseware.acadiau.ca/trctalk/call-to-action-83/
Gill, R., Pratt, C., A., & Virani, T. E. (2019). Creative Hubs in Question: Place, Space and Work in the Creative Economy. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing Pty.
King, A., & Woodroffe, J. (2017). Walking Interviews. In P. Liamputtong, Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 1-22). Singapore: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_28-1
Luka, M. E. (2018). Creative Hubs in Canada: Knowledge Networks and Opportunities. Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage, Arts Policy Branch.
Luka, M. E. (2022a). The New Main Street: Reshaping the Canadian Creative Ecosystem. In D. Beauregard, & J. Paquette, Canadian Cultural Policy in Transition (pp. 210-221). New York: Routledge.
Luka, M. E. (2022b). Creative Hubs: Sites of Community and Creative Work. In M. Campbell, & C. Thompson, Creative Industries in Canada (pp. 157-179). Toronto: Canadian Scholars.
Luka, M. E., & Wallace, J. (2020). Towards a Measurement Framework for Creative Hubs. Developed in consultation with Helen Yung, with additional research by Katy Illona Harris, Claudia Sicondolfo, Hillary Walker. Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage, Arts Branch.
Newswire Canada. (2017, April 26). Art and design hub Artscape Daniels Launchpad receives $21.4 million to support creative entrepreneurship. Retrieved from Newswire Canada: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/art-and-design-hub-artscape-daniels-launchpad-receives-214-million-to-support-creative-entrepreneurship-620074983.html
Public Engagement UK. (n.d.). What is Public Engagement? . Retrieved from National co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/about-engagement/what-public-engagement
Statistics Canada. (n.d.). Culture Statistics Portal. Retrieved from Statistics Canada: https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects-start/business_and_consumer_services_and_culture/culture
Wallace, J., & Luka, M. E. (2018). An Inventory of Creative Hubs in Canada. Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage, Arts Policy Branch.
Warren, M. (2023, August 29). Artscape, a Toronto non-profit arts space provider, to be placed into receivership. Retrieved from The Toronto Star: https://www.thestar.com/real-estate/artscape-a-toronto-non-profit-arts-space-provider-to-be-placed-into-receivership/article_5db66f08-3d0d-5406-8fb9-21a07e2ecf81.html
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organisations. London: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (4 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mary Elizabeth Luka, Caroline Klimek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.