Arts Sector Research in Development
Participant Perspectives on a Community-Engaged Research Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v8i2.7374Keywords:
community-engaged research, developmental evaluation, impact assessment, arts and cultureAbstract
Despite good intentions, academic research often reflects an extractive model and is not always seen as useful within the Canadian arts sector. Mass Culture is a non-profit organization that aims to bring together cultural workers and academics in support of collaborative research and better knowledge mobilization. To that end, their Research in Residence (RinR) initiative involved complex collaborations between the arts sector and academia to explore five applied research projects on a topic of shared importance to participants - that is, articulating the value of the arts through qualitative rather than quantitative measurements. To learn from the experimental research design, participants conducted a developmental evaluation with five lines of inquiry: benefits and effects, program design adaptations, values alignment, efficacy and potential, and knowledge mobilization and research engagement. The evaluation had three purposes: (1) to gather data and facilitate analysis of the key questions that the initiative was trying to understand; (2) to inform Mass Culture's implementation and adaptation of the initiative; and (3) to generate insights on principles and practices that could inform the design of future initiatives. This article considers the second and third purposes, outlining key lessons learned that shaped the initiative and/or should inform future projects.
References
Bernicky, S. (2023). Threads that become tendrils: Exploring EDI in the Settler-Canadian arts and cultural sector. Culture and Local Governance, 8(2), 19-37.
Bugg, E., Wright, T., & Zurba, M. (2023). Creativity in climate adaptation: Conceptualizing the role of arts organizations. Culture and Local Governance, 8(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v8i1.6666.
Campbell, M., Evans, C., & Wowk, L. (2022). Making community knowledge visible: Mapping Canadian arts-service organizations as cultural research conduits. Canadian Journal of Communication, 47(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2022v47n1a4013.
Denner, J., Bean, S., Campe, S., Martinez, J., & Torres, D. (2019). Negotiating trust, power, and culture in a research–practice partnership. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419858635.
DePrince, A. P., Alexander, A., Cook, J. M., & Gudiño, O. G. (2022). A roadmap for preventing and responding to trauma: Practical guidance for advancing community-engaged research. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(6), 948–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001159.
Flexner, J. L., Rawlings, V., & Riley, L. (2021). Introduction: Walking many paths toward a community-led paradigm. In Community-Led Research: Walking New Pathways Together (pp. 1–8). Sydney University Press.
Gamble, J. (2008). A Developmental Evaluation Primer. The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation.
Grauer, P. (2022, April). Sydney Pickering fosters new ways of research rooted in Indigenous Knowledge. Emily Carr University of Art and Design News. https://www.ecuad.ca/news/2022/sydney-pickering-new-ways-research-rooted-indigenous-knowledge
Herne, S. (2006). Communities of practice in art and design and museum and gallery education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360500487512
Holden, M., McDermott, M., Brown, B., & Friesen, S. (2022). What is it like to do community-engaged research?: Lessons learned from university researchers’ perspectives. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v15i1.444.
Hoover, S. M., Tiwari, S., Kim, J., Green, M., Richmond, A., Wynn, M., Nisbeth, K. S., Rennie, S., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2019). Convergence despite divergence: Views of academic and community stakeholders about the ethics of community-engaged research. Ethnicity and Disease, 29(2), 309–16. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.2.309.
Limes-Taylor Henderson, K., & Esposito, J. (2019). Using others in the nicest way possible: On colonial and academic practice(s), and an ethic of humility. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9–10), 876–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417743528.
London, R. A., Glass, R. D., Chang, E., Sabati, S., & Nojan, S. (2022). "We are about life-changing research”: Community partner perspectives on community-engaged research collaborations. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 26(1), 19–36.
Mass Culture. (2023). "About." https://massculture.ca/about/
McCaughey, C., Duxbury, N., & Meisner, A. (2014). Measuring cultural value in Canada: From national commissions to a culture satellite account. Cultural Trends, 23(2), 109–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2014.897452.
Pascal, S. (2023). Indigenous ways infiltrating the research realm. Culture and Local Governance, 8(2), 38-44.
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619860854.
Richmond, A. (2023). Access in counterpoint: Reflections on the 2021-2022 Arts’ Civic Impact Project. Culture and Local Governance, 8(2), 1-18.
Royal Commission on newspapers. (1981). Report. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/472245/publication.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamie Gamble, Robin Nelson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
