For an Assemblage-Based Conception of Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18192/politika.8324Keywords:
Climate change, Assemblage Theory, International RelationsAbstract
This paper argues that dominant international relations (IR) paradigms, tending to pit broad dichotomous categories of actants against one another (i.e., states and non-states and humans and non-humans) are inappropriate for the analysis of climate change as an IR phenomenon. instead, it proposes an ontology of climate change derived from assemblage theory as laid out by bennett (2005). after a brief introduction and definition of terms, the paper demonstrates the inadequacies of the dominant IR approaches for analyzing climate change, followed by a demonstration of the pertinence of assemblage theory as an alternative approach. It ultimately finds that assemblage theory is a valuable approach that could complement or potentially replace further elements of IR scholarship.
References
Bennett, J. (2005). The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture, 17(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-17-3-445
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Fox, N. J. (2023). Green capitalism, climate change and the technological fix: A more-than-human assessment. The Sociological Review, 71(5), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221121232
Geloso, V. (2022). Statogenic climate change? Julian Simon and institutions. Review of Austrian Economics, 35(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-022-00581-0
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023 synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syrdownloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf
Kiciński, J., & Chaja, P. (2021). Climate change, human impact and green energy transformation. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69933-8
Lelieveld, J., Klingmüller, K., Pozzer, A., Burnett, R. T., Haines, A., & Ramanathan, V. (2019). Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15), 7192–7197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819989116
Mitchell, R. B. (2001). Institutional aspects of implementation, compliance, and effectiveness. In U. Luterbacher & D. F. Sprinz (Eds.), International relations and global climate change (pp. 221–244). MIT Press.
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
Pereira, J. C., & Saramago, A. (2020). Introduction: Embracing non-human nature in world politics. In Non-human nature and world politics: Theory and practice (pp. 1–9). Springer International Publishing.
Popvski, V. (2018). ‘Hard’ and ‘soft’ law on climate change. In V. Popovski (Ed.), The implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change (pp. 19–41). Routledge.
Raustiala, K., & Bridgeman, N. (2001). Nonstate actors in the global climate regime. UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 07-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028603
Teschke, B. (2002). Theorizing the Westphalian system of states: International relations from absolutism to capitalism. European Journal of International Relations, 8(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008001001
Tokay, E. (2023). Climate change, environmental philosophy, and anthropocentrism. In G. Pellegrino & M. Di Paola (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of climate change (pp. 361–376). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0
Taylor, P. W. (1981). The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 197–218.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023, September 22). Frequently asked questions (FAQs). https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=709&t=6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Politika, the Undergraduate Journal of International Affairs, Politics and Policy aims to provide immediate open access to all published content.
Authors retain full copyright of the works published in the journal. All published articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are appropriately credited.
This licensing model affirms the journal’s commitment to open access and the free dissemination of scholarly work. Authors are encouraged to deposit their published work on personal websites and other relevant platforms to maximize visibility and impact.