Artists Embedded in Government: Expanding the Cultural Policy Toolkit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v8i1.6967Abstract
Artists have long worked in fields that are not related to art, instigating innovative ways of working in different institutional contexts from health to business to technology. Civic systems are no exception, with artists spearheading new ways of operating within government agencies. Some artists work covertly, bringing creative methods to traditional civic roles, while others are invited into government agencies in temporary positions as artists in residence addressing specific concerns. As local governments are increasingly challenged to provide services and operate equitably amid eroding public trust, opportunities for cross-sector collaboration uniting artists with government staff are compelling mechanisms for them to cocreate the necessary conditions for systemic change.
The research reported herein explores how artists are engaged in cross-sectoral collaborative models of cultural policy within local governments. Governments already recognize the potential of formal artist residency programs conducted over set periods of time to advance civic goals. In addition, artists have been engaged in this work through informal government partnerships in departments including transportation, parks, and public health. Some collaborations act as applied research enacted internally, bringing more complex understandings of government operations, while others become deep processes of external engagement to expand awareness of local concerns.
This paper presents a framework categorizing the structures in which artists work within government agencies to advance civic goals. The framework is based on research conducted on artists who were embedded in the government across the US from 2020 through 2022. Describing these structures highlights new ways of working within local government that center artists as agents that promote change; this paper lays the foundation for understanding how they operate and delineates opportunities and challenges for the artists and the governments that initiate collaboration. The framework is a foundation for cultural policy makers to evaluate artist in residence in government programs as a cultural policy tool and enable evaluation of the impact of their implementation.
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
Antal, A. B., & Strauß, A. (2013). Record, replay, shuffle and switch: How to see more and differently with artists in organizations. International Journal of Professional Management, 8(5), 17–28.
ArteEast. (2011). Residency resource handbook. ArteEast and The Delphina Foundation. https://issuu.com/arteeast/docs/residencyresourcehandbook
Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505–1530.
Berthoin Antal, A., & Strauß, A. (2014). Not only art’s task—Narrating bridges between unusual experiences with art and organizational identity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.11.001
Bonin-Rodriguez, P. (2015). Performing policy: How contemporary politics and cultural programs redefined U.S. artists for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9781137356505
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Cole, H. V. S., Anguelovski, I., Baró, F., García-Lamarca, M., Kotsila, P., Pulgar, C. P. del, Shokry, G., & Triguero-Mas, M. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Power and privilege, gentrification, and urban environmental justice in the global north. Cities & Health, 0(0), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1785176
Daniel, J. L., & Kim, M. (2020). Creative placemaking: Creating change by building partnerships. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(1), Article 1. doi: 10.20899/jpna.6.1.96-110
Du, J., King, R., & Chanchani, R. (2020). Tackling inequality in cities is essential for fighting COVID-19. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/tackling-inequality-cities-essential-fighting-covid-19
Dzigbede, K. D., Gehl, S. B., & Willoughby, K. (2020). Disaster resiliency of U.S. local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 634–643. doi: 10.1111/puar.13249
Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What we made: Conversations on art and social cooperation. Durham: Duke University Press.
Frenette, A. (2017). The rise of creative placemaking: Cross-sector collaboration as cultural policy in the United States. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 47(5), 333–345. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2017.1391727
Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network the new shape of the public sector. Brookings Institution Press.
Halbert, D. (2018). State of copyright: The complex relationships of cultural creation in a globalized world. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Hamby, E. (2018, December 18). Who are the naturally occurring artists in your municipal agency? Elizabeth Hamby. http://www.elizabethhamby.com/journal
Harris, C. (Ed.). (1999). Art and innovation: The Xerox PARC artist-in-residence program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hart, J. (2018, December 26). How an artist became a leader on a $90 million infrastructure project. Forecast Public Art. https://forecastpublicart.org/how-an-artist-became-a-leader-on-a-90-million-infrastructure-project/
Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. Behtesda: Jorge Pinto Books.
Jackson, M. R. (2018). Creative placemaking and expansion of opportunity – Observations and reflections. Kresge Foundation. https://kresge.org/sites/default/files/library/cp_white_paper_2_for_posting.pdf
Klein, B., Moss, G., & Edwards, L. (2015). Understanding copyright: Intellectual property in the digital age. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lingo, E. L., & Tepper, S. J. (2013). Looking back, looking forward: Arts-based careers and creative work. Work and Occupations, 40(4), 337–363. doi: 10.1177/0730888413505229
Lithgow, M., & Wall, K. (2017). Embedded aesthetics: Artist-in-residencies as sites of discursive struggle and social innovation. Seismopolite: Journal of Art and Politics. https://www.seismopolite.com/embedded-aesthetics-artist-in-residencies-as-sites-of-discursive-struggle-and-social-innovation
Markusen, A. (2013). Fuzzy concepts, proxy data: Why indicators would not track creative placemaking success. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(3), 291–303. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2013.836291
Martel, F., Page, R., & Schmuki, F. (2019). Entrepreneurial strategies for a positive economy”: 3rd creative economies report. Zurich University of the Arts. http://www.nxt-creatives.eu/knowledgecentre/entrepreneurial-strategies-for-a-positive-economy
Menger, P.-M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In V. A. Ginsburg & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Vol. 1, pp. 765–811). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01022-2
Nakagawa, A. (2022). A.I.R. head: Anatomy of an artist in residence. Los Angelas: Writ Large Press.
Neidich, W. (2012). The artist residency in the 21st century: Experiments in cultural potentiality and contamination. ArteEast Quarterly, Winter. https://www.warrenneidich.com/the-artist-residency-in-the-21st-century-experiments-in-cultural-potentiality-and-contamination/
O’Brian, M. (2013, July 23). Review: A wicked problem. Fogo Island Arts. https://www.fogoislandarts.ca/news/dialogues/a-wicked-problem/
Packard, C. (2021). Julia Weist’s “Public Record” probes the impact of artists on cities. Hyperallergic. https://hyperallergic.com/670621/julia-weists-public-record-probes-the-impact-of-artists-on-cities/
Phillips, P. C., Finkelpearl, T., Harris, L., Lippard, L. R., & Ukeles, M. (2016). Mierle Laderman Ukeles: Maintenance art. Prestel. Redaelli, E. (2020) Understanding American cultural policy: the multi-level governance of the arts and humanities, Policy Studies, 41(1), 80-97, doi: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1554804
Schiuma, P. G. (2009). The value of arts-based initiatives (Mapping Arts-Based Initiatives, p. 51). Arts & Business.
Schupbach, J. (2017). So how do you do creative placemaking? In How to Do Creative Placemaking (pp. 1–3). National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/How-to-do-Creative-Placemaking_Jan2017.pdf
Sidford, H., & Frasz, A. (2016). Creativity connects: Trends and conditions affecting U.S. artists (Center for Cultural Innovation and National Endowment for the Arts Report). National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/impact/research/publications/creativity-connects-trends-and-conditions-affecting-us-artists
Sköldberg, U. J., Woodilla, J., & Antal, A. B. (Eds.). (2015). Artistic interventions in organizations: Research, theory and practice (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315743486
Tavecchia, E. (2017). Mierle Laderman Ukeles “Maintenance Art” at Queens Museum, New York. Mousse Magazine. http://moussemagazine.it/mierle-laderman-ukeles-maintenance-art-queens-museum-new-york/
Taylor, J. K. (2021). Art practice as policy practice: Framing the work of artists embedded in government. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society. 51(4), doi: 10.1080/10632921.2021.1925193 Whitaker, A. (2022) Generous and ungenerous contracts: Case study of the artist William Powhida’s Grevsky and Store-to-Own contracts, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(3), 143-168, doi: 10.1080/10632921.2022.2041141
Whitehead, F. (2016, April 26). The embedded artist: Double agent. A Blade of Grass. http://clients.thejenyuan.com/abog/growing-dialogues/the-embedded-artist-double-agent/
Whitehead, F. (2020). Embedded artist. In F. Martel & H. Wickert (Eds.), Embedded Artists: Artists Outside the Art World: The World in Quest of Artists (pp. 10–37). Zurich University of the Arts.
Woronkowicz, J. (2020). The embedded artist worker: Shifting perspectives on artists in the labor force. In F. Martel & H. Wickert (Eds.), Embedded Artists: Artists Outside the Art World: The World in Quest of Artists (pp. 124–135). Zurich University of the Arts.
Zitcer, A. (2018). Making up creative placemaking. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi: 10.1177/0739456X18773424
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Johanna K. Taylor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
