Guest Editor: Rex Butler (Monash University)
Please email abstracts as an MS Word attachment to rex.butler@monash.edu
Deadline for abstracts (max. 300 words): September 1st, 2026
Notification of acceptance: December 1st, 2026
Deadline for articles: June 1st, 2027
Planned publication date: December, 2027
New issue guest-edited by Paul Deb entitled "Table Talk: On Moral Perfectionism."
Read more about C12 (2025) published!Part II of a double issue edited by Francesco Gandellini, Filippo Casati, and Gordon Bearn.
Read more about C11.2 published!Thanks to Francesco Gandellini, Filippo Casati, and Gordon Bearn for putting together the first part of a two-part issue of Conversations.
Read more about C11.1 published!Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies
CFP Special issue on Emersonian Moral Perfectionism
Guest Editor: Paul Deb (University of Oxford)
Deadline for abstracts (max. 300 words): 14 July 2023
Notification of acceptance: 31 July 2023
Deadline for articles (6,000-8,000 words, including notes): 30 November 2023
Planned publication of issue: December 2024
Congratulations to guest editors Brad Tabas and Paul Jenner for putting together an inspired collection of essays including contributions from:
Ruochen Bo (University of Toronto)
Arya Mohan (The English and Foreign Languages University)
Toril Moi (Duke University)
Timur Uçan (Bordeaux Montaigne University)
Congratulations to Guest Editor Moses Estrada-Alvarez (University of Leeds) for putting together a special issue on Cavell and Dialectic!
Featuring contributions from
Byron Davies (University of the Cloister of Sor Juana/Autonomous University of Guerrero)
Richard Eldridge (Swarthmore College)
Sandra Laugier (University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
Andrew Norris (University of California, Santa Barbara)
Rupert Read (University of East Anglia)
Martin Shuster (Goucher College)
Featuring contributions from
Rex Butler (Monash University)
Charles Djordjevic (St. Olaf College)
Michael McCreary (Johns Hopkins University)
Andrew Norris (University of California, Santa Barbara)
Brad Tabas (École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées de Bretagne)
Lucas Thompson (The University of Sydney)
Catherine Wheatley (King’s College London)
Dear Cavellians,
The Special Commemorative issue of Conversations No. 7, "Acknowledging Stanley Cavell," concludes with 24 entries and 27 contributors. Many thanks to David LaRocca for his exceptional editorial strengths and patience in putting everything together.
Read more about Cavellian Festschrift now closedWe are happy to announce on Stanley's birthday in memoriam the closing of our special commemorative issue with an additional 5 entries set to appear in an updated version in the near future. Stay tuned for upcoming pieces from
Lindsay Waters
Steven G. Affeldt
Abraham D. Stone
Nicholas Stang
Eric Ritter
Please check back soon!
Read more about Happy Birthday Stanley Cavell!We are happy to release today a special commemorative issue on the one-year anniversary of Stanley's passing.
Please note we are looking to add more reflective/celebratory pieces to the issue. As we are an electronic journal, we are taking the opportunity to keep our call for submissions open. See guest-editor David LaRocca's Extended Inviation appearing at the end of the Editorial Comment (p. 7).
The issue will be updated regularly. Please check back often.
Read more about C7: Acknowledging Stanley Cavell - CFP for Rolling Issue
Conversations 6 is out at virtually the last second of 2018! Many thanks and congratulations to special guest editor David Pérez-Chico (University of Zaragoza). Warm wishes and Happy Holidays to all!
Read more about Issue No. 6 published!Rastislav Dinić (University of Niš)
Richard Eldridge (Swarthmore College)
Jeff Frank (St. Lawrence University)
Babak Geranfar (Independent scholar)
Derek Gottlieb (University of Northern Colorado)
Larry Jackson (The New School)
Jon Najarian (Boston University)
Lawrence Rhu (University of South Carolina)
The Aesthetics of Politics and the Politics of Aesthetics In and After Cavell
Read more about CFP NO. 5Literary Cavell
In what sense is Cavell’s work indebted to literature, or literary precursors? While much is made of his writings on Shakespeare, Cavell has other literary interests manifested in writings on the Romantic poets (In Quest for the Ordinary, particularly his reading of Kant and Coleridge), 19th/20th century playwrights (Ibsen, Shaw, Beckett), and a sparse scattering of prose on a select cadre of novelists (Austen, Dickens, James, for example).
For the fourth issue of Conversations, we seek submissions that engage with Cavell’s literary influences and influence, and pose the question of whether Cavell is reading literature philosophically or whether he is reading philosophy like literature, or whether, indeed, it is profitable to pose such questions at all. Where do Emerson and Thoreau fit into this discussion? Possible topics include:
We also welcome shorter essays and responses that directly address Cavell’s concluding question to The Claim of Reason.
Papers should be approximately 6000 words, including footnotes, and must follow the notes and bibliography citation system described in The Chicago Manual of Style. Shorter, more intimate pieces of around 1200 words are also acceptable. Please email complete articles to Amir Khan at akhan134@uottawa.ca. If submitting via the online user interface, please notify one of the managing editors in a separate email. All submissions due September 15th, 2015.
Read more about CFP NO. 4
The second issue of Conversations is now available to view online or to download.
This special issue showcases Cavell's appeal "down under," all papers appearing under the auspices of guest editor, Professor David Macarthur, c/o the Philosophy Department at the University of Sydney.
Read more about Second issue published!Cavell and History
Whatever one makes of Cavell’s writings, one can hardly say they are historical. We are told, for example, that America’s military entanglement weighs in on his thoughts in "Disowning Knowledge," but what exactly has King Lear to do with Vietnam? Does the essay require, or deserve, proper historicizing? Would such an exercise benefit Cavellian study, or detract from it?
Moreover, Cavell himself explicitly, if still somewhat coyly, historicizes his skeptical argument in his introduction to his collection of essays on Shakespeare. Coy because Cavell is hardly interested in employing a “professional” historical methodology. When he discusses the “advent of skepticism,” as, historically speaking, marking the appearance of Shakespeare, Descartes, and the New Science, he notes also that, fictionally speaking, the Roman world of Shakespeare, as depicted in Antony and Cleopatra, is “haunted by the event of Christianity.”
Do competing threads of Romanization, Christianization, the advent of skepticism, the New Science, and Renaissance theatre require sorting out?
Lastly, in discussing the appearance of what he coins the seven comedies of remarriage in Pursuits of Happiness, he expressly denies a cause-and-effect relationship leading to the appearance of this new genre:
"My thought is that the genre emerges full-blown, in a particular instance first (or a set of them if they are simultaneous), and then works out its internal consequences in further instances. So that, as I would like to put it, it has no history, only a birth and a logic (or a biology)." (27-28)
Once again, we accept submissions from all theoretical perspectives and disciplines and encourage attempts to assimilate seemingly disparate disciplinary areas of Cavell’s thinking.
For the second issue of Conversations, the editors welcome papers that engage with Cavell’s different, perhaps undecided or indecisive, views on history and historicization. Possible paper topics include:
Papers should be no more than 6000 words, including footnotes, and must follow the notes and bibliography citation system described in The Chicago Manual of Style. We also welcome shorter, more intimate pieces addressing specific questions (800-1200 words).
Complete articles should be sent to akhan134@uottawa.ca no later than July 31st, 2014.
Please note that review of submissions for the inaugural issue of Conversations is underway.
The Editors expect to launch the first issue (Fall 2013) in October.
Click below to read CFP No. 1.
Read more about First IssueMarc Shell says of Cavell’s autobiography that it will be read for “decades, even centuries” and, more importantly, that it will “contribute to how we understand the lives of philosophers.”
Though we are neither decades nor centuries away from the publication of Little Did I Know (Stanford University Press, 2010), the editors of Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies invite essays that tackle some of the implications of these formidable “excerpts from memory”, particularly now that some of the dust accompanying its initial reception has settled.
We invite papers for the inaugural issue of Conversations that discuss and engage with Cavell’s autobiographic writings, not only Little Did I Know, but also his earlier autobiographical exercises A Pitch of Philosophy (Harvard University Press, 1996) and references to his personal history from other texts.
Close readings that negotiate both the professional and personal ramifications of the many encounters Cavell so compellingly recounts are welcome – see, for example, James Conant’s recent essay “The Triumph of the Gift over the Curse in Stanley Cavell’s Little Did I Know” in Modern Language Notes. Articles may also address broader issues raised by the autobiographical elements in Cavell’s publications for the field of philosophy, and its approaches and traditions, through a less narrow engagement with his texts and philosophical contribution.
We accept submissions from all theoretical perspectives and disciplines and encourage attempts to assimilate seemingly disparate (disciplinary) areas of Cavell’s thinking (or recounting). Possible topics include:
Papers should be no more than 6000 words, including footnotes, and must follow the notes and bibliography citation system described in The Chicago Manual of Style. We also welcome shorter, more intimate pieces addressing specific questions (800-1200 words). Proposals of around 500 words (for long articles) and 250 words (for short articles) should be sent by 1 December 2012 to both managing editors, but complete articles will be considered as well.
Read more about CFP NO. 1
