Finding the Right Balance: Integrating Old and New Approaches for Anatomy Teaching

Authors

  • Rana Elbeshbeishy University of Ottawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18192/jpds-sjpd.v2i1.2427

Keywords:

anatomy, teaching techniques, learning, innovative approaches, technology-based education, computer, curriculum update, problem-based learning, online games

Abstract

Although anatomy is one of the core knowledge pillars within medical teaching, the level of knowledge covered in the modernized medical curriculan recent years around the world has declined considerably, due to the use of old-fashioned pedagogical methods. This study examines available approaches to anatomy teaching and how to improve student learning in this area, while also targeting higher skills and knowledge for future medical personnel. Using a mix of qualitative and quantitative methodologies to collect data, mini-interviews and online surveys were conducted with a sample of four participants (a student, a resident, and two medical educators) to explore the different aspects of anatomy learning and its key challenges. From this small sample of medical students and educators, data was collected around four key themes: fundamental introductory learning, technology-based education, teaching techniques, and updated curriculum. A thematic analysis of the participants’ insights revealed that, while technology-based alternatives were considered effective tools, dissecting cadavers was the preferred means of learning anatomy.

Author Biography

Rana Elbeshbeishy, University of Ottawa

Rana Elbeshbeishy is a medical doctor from Egypt working as an academic staff member in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa. She earned her MD, M.Sc. and PhD from the Faculty of Medicine in Egypt. She worked previously as professor of anatomy and embryology at Faculties of Medicine in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. For more than 25 years, she has taught medical students and other health practitioners and has several publications related to medicine. She was an Oncologist before she shifted to teaching, which she loves most as it was always her passion to help students. She feels happy when she receives their feedback telling her that her teaching was a keystone that pushed them to excel.

References

Bhangu, A., Boutefnouchet, T., Yong, X., Abrahams, P., & Joplin, R. (2010). A three-year prospective longitudinal cohort study of medical students' attitudes toward anatomy teaching and their career aspirations. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(4), 184-190.

Bridges, S., Green, J., Botelho, M., & Tsang, P. C. S. (2015). Blended learning and PBL: An interactional ethnographic approach to understanding knowledge construction in situ. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. Hmelo-Silver, & P. Ertmer, (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, (pp. 107-130). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Carlyle, K. J. (2005). A comparison of cadaver, computer and cadaver/computer laboratory classes in teaching anatomy to undergraduate university students. (Master dissertation). Retrieved from Library and Archives Canada (ISBN: 0-494-03746-6)

Hoffman, H., Murray, M., Curlee, R., & Fritchle, A. (2001). Anatomic visualizeR: Teaching and learning anatomy with virtual reality. In M. Akay and A. Marsh (Eds.), Information technologies in Medicine: Medical simulation and education, Volume I (pp. 205-218) New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Johnson, E. O., Charchanti, A. V., & Troupis, T. G. (2012). Modernization of an anatomy class: From conceptualization to implementation. A case for integrated multimodal–multidisciplinary teaching. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(6), 354-366.

Kaufman, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (2010). Teaching and learning in medical education: How theory can inform practice. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (pp. 16-36). Dundee: Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Nilsen, T. T. (2015). Ontology-driven education: Teaching anatomy with intelligent 3D games on the Web (Doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/33983/Nilsen_washington_0250E_14638.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

O’leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.

Patel, K. M., & Moxham, B. J. (2006). Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clinical Anatomy, 19(2), 132-141.

Peterson, D. C., & Mlynarczyk, G. S. (2016). Analysis of traditional versus three‐dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(6), 529-536.

Terrell, M. (2006). Anatomy of learning: Instructional design principles for the anatomical sciences. The Anatomical Record, 289(6), 252-260.

Thomas, P. A., Kern, D. E., Hughes, M. T., & Chen, B. Y. (2015). Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Turney, B. (2007). Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 89(2), 104-107.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-07