The Promise of a Qualitative Case Study Approach for Research on Caregiver Involvement in Inpatient Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Authors

  • Kaylee Eady
  • Katherine Moreau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18192/riss-ijhs.v5i1.1440

Keywords:

Caregiver, case study, qualitative, rehabilitation, traumatic brain injury

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate that, theoretically, a qualitative case study approach holds substantial promise for conducting research on caregiver involvement in inpatient traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation.

Methods: Narrative reviews of the TBI rehabilitation and case study literature are presented to explain our rationale for advocating the use of a qualitative case study approach for research in this area.

Results: We found that there are four interconnected reasons why this research approach is well suited for investigating caregiver involvement in in-patient TBI rehabilitation. More specifically, a qualitative case study approach allows us to: (a) address the context of inpatient TBI rehabilitation; (b) account for the complexity of caregiver involvement; (c) adapt research to the practical and ethical needs of TBI inpatients and their caregivers; and (d) create research that is congruent with family-centered theory.

Conclusion: A qualitative case study approach has the ability to address the complexity and context that surrounds caregiver involvement in inpatient TBI rehabilitation. A case study approach is also congruent with the characteristics of inpatient rehabilitation settings and can take into consideration family-centered theory, which is instrumental to understanding caregiver involvement. 

References

Allen, R. I., & Petr, C. G. (1998). Rethinking family- centered practice. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(1), 4-15.

Bamm, E. L., & Rosenbaum, P. (2008). Family-centered theory: Origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(8), 1618-1624.

Behm, J., & Gray, N. (2012). Interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. In K. L. Mauk (Ed.), Rehabilitation nursing: a comtemporary approach to practice (pp. 51-62). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Braga, L. W., Da Paz Junior, A. C., & Ylvisaker, M. (2005). Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Injury, 19(10), 819-831.

Chua, K. S., Ng, Y. S., Yap, S. G., & Bok, C. W. (2007). A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 36(1), 31-42.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Degeneffe, C. E. (2001). Family caregiving and traumatic brain injury. Health & Social Work, 26(4), 257-268.

Fleming, J., Sampson, J., Cornwell, P., Turner, B., & Griffin, J. (2012). Brain injury rehabilitation: The lived experience of inpatients and their family caregivers. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(2), 184-193.

Foster, A. M., Armstrong, J., Buckley, A., Sherry, J., Young, T., Foliaki, S., . . . McPherson, K. M. (2012). Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process: A rehabilitation provider’s development of support strategies for family members of people with traumatic brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(22), 1855-1862.

Gilgun, J. F. (1994). A case for case studies in social work research. Social Work, 39(4), 371-380.

Harris, J. E., Eng, J. J., Miller, W. C., & Dawson, A. S. (2010). The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke. Physical Therapy, 90(9), 1302-1310.

Kreutzer, J. S., Stejskal, T. M., Ketchum, J. M., Marwitz, J. H., Taylor, L. A., & Menzel, J. C. (2009). A preliminary investigation of the brain injury family intervention: Impact on family members. Brain Injury, 23(6), 535-547.

Mathison, S. (2005). Encyclopaedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Nutt, R. L. (2012). Systemic perspective as foundational to cultural competence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(4), 323-325.

Rosenbaum, P., King, S., Law, M., King, G., & Evans, J. (1998). Family-centred service: A conceptual framework and research review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 18(1), 1-20.

Sherer, M., Evans, C. C., Leverenz, J., Stouter, J., Irby Jr, J. W., Lee, J. E., & Yablon, S. A. (2007). Therapeutic alliance in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation: Predictors of strength of alliance and impact of alliance on outcome. Brain Injury, 21(7), 663-672.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Den- zin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Tsaousides, T., & Gordon, W. A. (2009). Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: Assessment to treatment. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 76(2), 173-181.

Walshe, C. E., Caress, A. L., Chew-Graham, C., & Todd, C. J. (2004). Case studies: A research strategy appropriate for palliative care? Palliative Medicine, 18(8), 677-684.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L., Coehlo, C., Yorkston, K., Kennedy, M., Sohlberg, M. M., & Avery, J. (2007). Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence. Brain Injury, 21(8), 769-805.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-10

Issue

Section

Articles