The Ethics of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Opinion Piece Examining the Moral Distinction Between Positive and Negative Selection of Traits Using PGD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18192/riss-ijhs.v3i1.1451Keywords:
N/AAbstract
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) follows in vitro fertilization (IVF) of several ova. Negative selection (NS), or the discarding of embryos containing undesirable alleles, is currently being performed in IVF clinics. Conversely, positive selection (PS) is the discarding of embryos that do not contain a desirable allele. In other words, PS keeps an embryo because it contains a desirable genetic profile.
There are many groups that support NS but there are far fewer who support PS. The bioconservative philosophy, led by philosophers such as Leon Kass, opposes PS and bioliberalism in general. Conversely, NS (and PS) of embryos resonates best of all with the bioliberalism philosophy. More specifically, a subset of bioliberalism, called transhumanism.
In order to find NS morally permissible and PS morally unacceptable, one must support one’s position by making a moral distinction between the two types of selection. The major claims against PS include that it is not medically serious, that it propagates eugenics, that it propagates sex selection and that it elicits a moral repugnance which proves its immorality. In analyzing these arguments, I hope to show that none of them are consistent in their application, and that their inability to be applied universally significantly weakens their case.
References
Baldwin, T. (2006). Book review: The chosen child. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 7(7), 673. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400744
Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1-30. Retrieved from http://jetpress.org/volume14/ bostrom.html
Bostrom, N., & Savulescu, J. (2008). Introduction. In N. Bostrom & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Human Enhancement (pp. 1-24). Oxford University, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caplan, A. L., McGee, G., & Magnus D. (1999). What is immoral about eugenics? British Medical Journal, 319, 1284-1285. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1284
Chadwick, R., & Levitt, M. (1998). Genetic technology: A threat to deafness. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 1, 209-215. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1023%2FA%3A1009960924838
Crowe, K. and Dakin, P. (2012, January 16). Selective abortions prompt call for ultrasound rules. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News. Retrieved from www.cbc.ca
Ganatra, B. (2008). Maintaining access to safe abortion and reducing sex ratio imbalances in Asia. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(31), 90-98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080 (08)31394-9
Glover, J. (1984). Questions about some uses of genetic engineering. In T. Honderich (Ed.), What sort of people should there be? (pp. 25-52). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Glover, J. (2006). Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. Oxford University, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1923). Deadalus or science and the future. Cambridge, UK: E. P. Dutton and Company.
Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton University, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Purdy, L. M. (1996). Genetics and reproductive risk: Can having children be immoral? Chapter 1 from Reproducing Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Roache, R., & Clark, S. (2009). Bioconservatism, bioliberalism, and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance. Monash Bioethics Review, 28(1), 1-21. Retrieved from http://journals.publishing.monash.edu/ojs/ index.php/mber/article/view/571
Savulescu, J. (1999). Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 402- 405. Retrieved from https://www.mja.com.au/journal/1999/171/7/sex-selection-case
Sheather, J., & Shah, T. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in medical humanitarian practice: cases for reflection for Medecins Sans Frontieres. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 162–165. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038448
Singer, P. (1974). All animals are Equal. Philosophical Exchange 1(5), pp. 103-116. Retrieved here: https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/singer-peter-all-animals-are-equal-original.pdf
Thompson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 47- 66. Retrieved from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2265091
Tooley, M. (1972). Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(1), 37-65. Retrieved from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2264919
Vallor, S. (2009). Enhancement Technologies and human
dignity: on the virtue of transformation. Proceedings of The Society for Philosophy and Technology: Converging Technologies, Changing Societies (pp. 40-41). Twente. Proceedings available at http://www.utwente.nl/gw/wijsb/archive/Archive%20activities/spt2009/programme/proceedings.pdf
Vogel, L. (2012). Sex selection migrates to Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148(3), 163-164. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4091
Women in the workforce: female power (2009, December 30). 2009.The Economist. Retrieved from http:// www.economist.com/node/15174418
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- All authors published in the IJHS will retain copyright of their article.
- Authors grant the IJHS the right of first publication of their submitted articles.
- All articles published in the IJHS are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share articles if original authors and journal of initial publication are acknowledged.
- The IJHS is published online and in print, therefore the journal is not responsible for any unauthorized misuse of published content in either electronic or print form
- The IJHS retains the serial distribution rights to all contents
- It is the responsibility of the authors and not the IJHS to ensure proper permissions for all cited work have been obtained