The Ethics of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Opinion Piece Examining the Moral Distinction Between Positive and Negative Selection of Traits Using PGD

Authors

  • Helena Bleeker

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18192/riss-ijhs.v3i1.1451

Keywords:

N/A

Abstract

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) follows in vitro fertilization (IVF) of several ova. Negative selection (NS), or the discarding of embryos containing undesirable alleles, is currently being performed in IVF clinics. Conversely, positive selection (PS) is the discarding of embryos that do not contain a desirable allele. In other words, PS keeps an embryo because it contains a desirable genetic profile.

There are many groups that support NS but there are far fewer who support PS. The bioconservative philosophy, led by philosophers such as Leon Kass, opposes PS and bioliberalism in general. Conversely, NS (and PS) of embryos resonates best of all with the bioliberalism philosophy. More specifically, a subset of bioliberalism, called transhumanism.

In order to find NS morally permissible and PS morally unacceptable, one must support one’s position by making a moral distinction between the two types of selection. The major claims against PS include that it is not medically serious, that it propagates eugenics, that it propagates sex selection and that it elicits a moral repugnance which proves its immorality. In analyzing these arguments, I hope to show that none of them are consistent in their application, and that their inability to be applied universally significantly weakens their case. 

References

Abraham, C. (2009, January 7). Unnatural selection: Is evolving reproductive technology ushering in a new age of eugenics? The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from www.theglobeandmail.com

Baldwin, T. (2006). Book review: The chosen child. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 7(7), 673. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400744

Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1-30. Retrieved from http://jetpress.org/volume14/ bostrom.html

Bostrom, N., & Savulescu, J. (2008). Introduction. In N. Bostrom & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Human Enhancement (pp. 1-24). Oxford University, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caplan, A. L., McGee, G., & Magnus D. (1999). What is immoral about eugenics? British Medical Journal, 319, 1284-1285. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1284

Chadwick, R., & Levitt, M. (1998). Genetic technology: A threat to deafness. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 1, 209-215. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1023%2FA%3A1009960924838

Crowe, K. and Dakin, P. (2012, January 16). Selective abortions prompt call for ultrasound rules. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News. Retrieved from www.cbc.ca

Ganatra, B. (2008). Maintaining access to safe abortion and reducing sex ratio imbalances in Asia. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(31), 90-98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080 (08)31394-9

Glover, J. (1984). Questions about some uses of genetic engineering. In T. Honderich (Ed.), What sort of people should there be? (pp. 25-52). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Glover, J. (2006). Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. Oxford University, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haldane, J. B. S. (1923). Deadalus or science and the future. Cambridge, UK: E. P. Dutton and Company.

Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton University, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Purdy, L. M. (1996). Genetics and reproductive risk: Can having children be immoral? Chapter 1 from Reproducing Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Roache, R., & Clark, S. (2009). Bioconservatism, bioliberalism, and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance. Monash Bioethics Review, 28(1), 1-21. Retrieved from http://journals.publishing.monash.edu/ojs/ index.php/mber/article/view/571

Savulescu, J. (1999). Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 402- 405. Retrieved from https://www.mja.com.au/journal/1999/171/7/sex-selection-case

Sheather, J., & Shah, T. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in medical humanitarian practice: cases for reflection for Medecins Sans Frontieres. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 162–165. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038448

Singer, P. (1974). All animals are Equal. Philosophical Exchange 1(5), pp. 103-116. Retrieved here: https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/singer-peter-all-animals-are-equal-original.pdf

Thompson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 47- 66. Retrieved from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2265091

Tooley, M. (1972). Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(1), 37-65. Retrieved from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2264919

Vallor, S. (2009). Enhancement Technologies and human
dignity: on the virtue of transformation. Proceedings of The Society for Philosophy and Technology: Converging Technologies, Changing Societies (pp. 40-41). Twente. Proceedings available at http://www.utwente.nl/gw/wijsb/archive/Archive%20activities/spt2009/programme/proceedings.pdf

Vogel, L. (2012). Sex selection migrates to Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148(3), 163-164. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4091

Women in the workforce: female power (2009, December 30). 2009.The Economist. Retrieved from http:// www.economist.com/node/15174418

Downloads

Published

2016-03-10

Issue

Section

Articles