Borderline personality disorder: is diagnosis offering service or stigma?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common diagnosis I encountered while on my psychiatry rotation. The stigma surrounding the diagnosis and the negative attitudes of health care professionals towards these patients raised interesting questions regarding the approach to and benefit of formal diagnosis. Through reflection, two important learning points are proposed: be aware of the stigma towards BPD patients and approach each patient with an open mind and a professional attitude, and carefully examine the context of BPD symptoms before attributing a patient’s difficulties to a single diagnosis.
RÉSUMÉ
Le trouble de la personnalité limite (TPL) est un diagnostic commun que j’ai croisé au cours de mon stage en psychiatrie. La stigmati- sation entourant ce diagnostic et les attitudes négatives des professionnels de la santé face à ces patients soulèvent d’intéressantes questions quant à l’avantage d’établir un diagnostic officiel et l’approche à suivre pour y arriver. À la suite de réflexions, deux éléments importants à retenir sont suggérés : être conscient de la stigmatisation envers les patients avec le TPL et approcher chaque patient avec un esprit ouvert et une attitude professionnelle, et examiner attentivement le contexte entourant les symptômes du TPL avant d’attribuer les difficultés des patients à un seul diagnostic.
Article Details
- Authors publishing in the UOJM retain copyright of their articles, including all the drafts and the final published version in the journal.
- While UOJM does not retain any rights to the articles submitted, by agreeing to publish in UOJM, authors are granting the journal right of first publication and distribution rights of their articles.
- Authors are free to submit their works to other publications, including journals, institutional repositories or books, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in UOJM.
- Copies of UOJM are distributed both in print and online, and all materials will be publicly available online. The journal holds no legal responsibility as to how these materials will be used by the public.
- Please ensure that all authors, co-authors and investigators have read and agree to these terms.
- Works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
2. Grant BF, Chou SP, Goldstein RB, et al. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(4):533-45.
3. Zimmerman M, Rothschild L, Chelminski I. The prevalence of DSM- IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(10):1911-8.
4. Paris J. Implications of long-term outcome research for the management of patients with borderline personality disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2002;10(6):315-23.
5. van Den Bosch LMC, Koeter MWJ, Stijnen T, Verheul R, van Den Brink W. Sustained efficacy of dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(9):1231-41.
6. O’Connell B, Dowling M. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21:518-25.
7. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Responses of mental health clinicians to patients with borderline personality disorder. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2013;10(5-6):39- 43.
8. Markham D, Trower P. The effects of the psychiatric label ‘borderline personality disorder’ on nursing staff’s perceptions and causal attributions for challenge behaviours. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;42:243-56.
9. Treloar AJC. A qualitative investigation of the clinical experience of working with borderline personality disorder. NZ J Psychol. 2009;38(2):30-4.
10. Aviram RB, Brodsky BS, Stanley B. Borderline personality disorder, stigma,
and treatment implications. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2006;14(5):249-56.
11. Knaak S, Szeto ACh, Fitch K, Modgill G, Patten S. Stigma towards borderline personality disorder: effectiveness and generalizability of an anti-stigma program for healthcare providers using a pre-post randomized design. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015;2:9.