Evaluation of a Community-based Concussion Prevention and Advocacy Program at the University of Ottawa

Article Sidebar

The UOJM 8.1 cover depicts a heart valve replacement surgery, and draws a contrast between the fine movements of the surgeons’ hands and the tempestuous task below.
PDF
Published: May 7, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18192/uojm.v8i1.2357
Keywords:
Concussion, Injury prevention, medical education

Main Article Content

Henry Liu

Abstract

Background: Injury prevention and advocacy often receives little attention in medical education despite constituting a leading cause of morbidity and premature deaths. Brain Waves is a national concussion prevention program where medical student volunteers (MSVs) deliver a one-hour interactive presentation at the classroom level. This paper reviews the data from the past eleven years of curriculum delivery, highlighting the successes and challenges towards initiating an injury prevention advocacy program at the medical school level.


Methods: Our database included demographics collected from 2007 to 2017 as well as online survey ratings and written feedback from participating teachers and MSVs for the 2016 and 2017 school years.


Results: The Ottawa’s Brain Waves program has been successful in the recruitment of 636 MSVs and delivering the curriculum to 9848 elementary school students over the past 11 years. Survey responses from MSVs (N=36) rated their experience positively on a 5-item Likert scale for the following dimensions for the injury prevention curriculum: Training satisfaction (4.72±0.46), Competence (4.80±0.41) and Timing (4.51±0.67). Teacher responses (N=10) showed that 90% rated the program as “Good” or “Excellent”. Written feedback from MSVs and teachers highlighted the importance of time management, focused-lesson plans and activity-based engagement.


Conclusions: Through involvement in the Ottawa Brain Waves program, MSVs actively contributed to mitigating risks of accidental brain injuries, adapted to the needs of the classroom and heightened their curiosity in community-based advocacy.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Surgery and Transplantation
Section
Original Research
  1. Authors publishing in the UOJM retain copyright of their articles, including all the drafts and the final published version in the journal.
  2. While UOJM does not retain any rights to the articles submitted, by agreeing to publish in UOJM, authors are granting the journal right of first publication and distribution rights of their articles.
  3. Authors are free to submit their works to other publications, including journals, institutional repositories or books, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in UOJM.
  4. Copies of UOJM are distributed both in print and online, and all materials will be publicly available online. The journal holds no legal responsibility as to how these materials will be used by the public.
  5. Please ensure that all authors, co-authors and investigators have read and agree to these terms.
  6. Works are  licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

1. Volpe R, Lewko J, Batra A. A compendium of evidence-based best practices in prevention of neurotrauma. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press; 2002. 223–6.

2. Tuchfarber B, Garcia VF, Zins J. Injuries, Unintentional, Adolescence. In Encyclopedia of Primary Prevention and Health Promotion. Springer US; 2003. 621-7.

3. Yanchar NL, Warda LJ, Fuselli P. Child and youth injury prevention: A public health approach. Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Nov;17(9):511-2.

4. Vassilyadi M, Duquette C, Shamji MF, Orders S, Dagenais S. Evaluation of ThinkFirst for kids injury prevention curriculum for grades 7/8. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Nov;36(6):761-8

5. Canadian Medical Association. The role of physicians in prevention and health promotion. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153:208A-208D.

6. Dharamsi S, Richards M, Louie D, Murray D, Berland A, Whitfield M, et al. Enhancing medical students’ conceptions of the CanMEDS Health Advocate Role through international service-learning and critical reflection: A phenomenological study. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):977-82.

7. Yoshii I, Sayegh R, Lot pour S, Vaca FE. Need for injury-prevention education in medical school curriculum. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;11(1):40-3.

8. Dobson S, Voyer S, Regehr G. Perspective: agency and activism: re-thinking health advocacy in the medical profession. Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1161-4.

9. Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it?. Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):63-7.

10. Lévêque B, Baudier F, Janvrin MP. The contribution of physicians to childhood injury prevention in France. Injury Prevention. Inj Prev. 1995 Sep;1(3):155-8.

11. Leveridge M, Beiko D, Wilson JW, Siemens DR. Health advocacy training in urology: a Canadian survey on attitudes and experience in residency. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007 Nov;1(4):363-9.

12. Sta ord S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, Wong RY. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Nov 18;10:82.

13. Gresham LS, Zirkle DL, Tolchin S, Jones C, Marou A, Miranda J. Partnering for injury prevention: evaluation of a curriculum-based intervention program among elementary school children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Apr;16(2):79-87.

14. Wesner ML. An evaluation of Think First Saskatchewan: a head and spinal cord injury prevention program. Can J Public Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;94(2):115-20.